Posted on 05/17/2019 4:38:55 AM PDT by Kaslin
Listen to various abortion activists and Hollywood-faded stars and you might be under the impression that Georgia, Alabama and other states have just passed laws that could give women the death penalty for having abortions. In fact, some news outlets have run stories that these states would arrest women for having abortions.
Sadly, at a time when the news media and progressive activists lament the President's dubious relationship with the truth, these are not just misstatements but outright lies. Last week, Alabama passed a law that would prohibit abortion except for situations where the mother's own life is at risk. News outlets faithfully reported that under this law, women could be jailed for having an abortion.
Section 5 of the new Alabama law states, and this is a direct quote: "No woman upon whom an abortion is performed or attempted to be performed shall be criminally or civilly liable. Furthermore, no physician confirming the serious health risk to the child's mother shall be criminally or civilly liable for those actions." One need never get to that section, however. The synopsis of the legislation that precedes the actual legislative language states, "This bill would provide that a woman who receives an abortion will not be held criminally culpable or civilly liable for receiving the abortion." Perhaps reporters could read the legislation instead of taking abortion activists' statements as truth.
The same is true in Georgia. Actress Alyssa Milano claimed on social media that "The Georgia bill states that a woman can be investigated for miscarrying and that women who travel to another state to get an abortion can spend up to ten years in prison." This is actually a lie. The law does not say that.
Georgia has, since 1876, prohibited the prosecution of a woman for the death of her unborn child for any reason. In May 1997, Jacquelyn Aretha Hillman was indicted for allegedly shooting herself in the abdomen to kill her unborn child. She was eight months pregnant, 18 years old, and the child's father was nowhere to be found. The child died.
Because Georgia law prohibits prosecuting a woman for the death of her unborn child, prosecutors sought to charge Hillman with unlawfully performing an abortion. The Georgia Court of Appeals ruled in Hillman v. State of Georgia that no woman could be charged for the death of her own unborn child for any reason. In fact, the court said if a woman could be charged for the death of her unborn child, "any woman who suffers a post-viability miscarriage could be subject to scrutiny regarding whether or not she intentionally acted to cause the miscarriage."
One need only read the text of Georgia's new fetal heartbeat law to see this has not changed. When given the opportunity to overrule the Hillman decision by legislation, the legislature declined. When given the opportunity to repeal the 1876 statute that clearly prohibits prosecuting women for the death of their unborn child, no matter the cause, the legislature refused.
One would never know this by listening to news coverage of these pieces of legislation. One would never know it from the fundraisers being held by progressives using these laws as political causes. Those who think the media should have some level of honesty in how they report these issues are going to again be disappointed. The supposed champions of truth in the press have embraced a party line that is wholly dishonest.
There is also a necessary moment of honesty for the pro-life movement. While the movement pours its energy into banning abortion, many abortions are the result of desperation on the part of women who view themselves as out of options. The pro-life community needs to expand options.
Working to ban abortion is good. It is taking a human life at its most vulnerable stage of development. Working to make adoption easier and less expensive is also necessary. Providing support and safety for pregnant women is also necessary. The pro-life cause has science on its side. It also needs to make sure pregnant moms know the pro-life movement is on their side.
If Mr. Erickson has his way with Hillary winning, Roe would be safe for the next 50 years.
*Had his way.
Erickson is a never-Trump POS. I have no more interest in his opinion than I would the Cortez nitwit, the Talib Nazi or the DeBlasio communist.
“...at a time when the news media and progressive activists lament the President’s dubious relationship with the truth...”
Again. It’s like they can’t write an article without first establishing their “balanced” credentials.
Nobody cares what Stupid Stupidson thinks. . .He may speak the truth occasionally but his breath stinks so bad we prefer he just keep his big mouth shut!!
I am at a loss as to why we must make abortions easier to obtain?
Perhaps a means tested free BC program or emergency morning after pills available subsidized, tubal ligation subsidies but abortions in the vast majority of cases result from abrogation of personal responsibility. Why should the State take on the consequences?
Sad that so many women have denied their nature as humans and chosen to rejoice at killing their babies.
ICWYDT
This could be fun.
Idiot Idiotson
Goober Gooberson
Fraud Fraudson
Plant Plantson
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.