Everyone that can remember 2016 on line should know that Facebook was totally filled with one-sided anti-Trump, and anti-republican ads. And Google had search results that only showed Hillary’s web-sites. While Trump searches went to anti-Trump news articles no matter how hard you tried to find Trumps own web-site. Russian’s only bought a few ads which were mostly for local candidates and some were for Hillary. There is no evidence that Russians actually bought any material pro-Trump ads on Microsoft, Facebook, or Google. But clearly all these companies were providing free ads to Hillary.
There has to be a conservative alternative to Google and Faceplant developed. How? I have no idea. But there’s gotta be a way.
When Zuckerberg suspends people, bans people, he is acting as an EDITOR. Yet, as he does that more and more it seems he is a PUBLISHER.
Hey, in publishing you incur LIABILITY for the stuff you personally write, but even for stuff others wrote and YOU published; when NBC rigs trucks to explode or NBC recuts George Zimmerman audio, they can tell you all about that.
Why is Zuckerberg permitted to act as editor but NOT publisher..?
THAT is why he called for FB to be more tightly regulated:
Because he —and his scummy breathren— want to avoid liability.
Why can they ALONE have it both ways..?
“
Everyone that can remember 2016 on line should know that Facebook was totally filled with one-sided anti-Trump, and anti-republican ads”
Trump says otherwise.
How Facebook ads helped elect Trump
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-facebook-ads-helped-elect-trump/
These should be apolitical, NOT taking sides at all.