Posted on 05/09/2019 10:15:24 AM PDT by rx
Tensions are rising in the Vatican in the last few hours for a number of reasons. First of all, a group of 19 (now 51! [now, 8 days after publication, many more] Catholic priests and academics have appealed with an “Open letter to the bishops of the Catholic Church” to declare Pope Francis a heretic: [snip]
However, this is not the only crisis discussed at the Holy See, because the priority of the day for Pope Francis and the Venezuelan Black Pope of the Jesuits, Arturo Sosa, is protecting and saving the life of their loyal agent Nicolás Maduro. The secret alliance between the Jesuits and Russia is helping Maduro, but for how long? Local Freemasons, with the help of the CIA, are pushing the Venezuelan National Assembly Chief Juan Guaido, now a 33rd degree of the A.A.S.R., to wage war against the Jesuits and their Colectivo groups supporting Maduro all over the country .
Zagami covers the recent letter that calls for the Pope to abandon what are claimed to be his many heresies.
Here's a link to the Open Letter to Bishops of the Catholic Church.
As many know, Pope Francis monetarily supports Catholic organizations that help illegals travel to and enter the US.
One of this article's highlights is the schism of support between Guaido and Maduro, pitting Russians, Jesuits, local Masons and the CIA against one another.
Francis is an ‘anti-pope’.
How they got Benedict out (without killing him) is a mystery. I say he’s still the pope. And Peter the Roman comes after Francis.
JP II is still my Pope.
This pope is unfit to be pope. He arranged the deal with bammy and castro, and the one with bammy and the iran mullas. By those actions he ceased being the successor of Peter and proved he is nothing but a gay-loving, muzzy-loving marxist.
Thank you for posting this.
Why couldn’t Francis be Petrus Romanus, the False Prophet who introduces the Beast to the world?
Yeah, I keep hearing bits and pieces of how Soros and Obama did this like:
But there hasn’t been much uncovered on it really.
Government opponents fear the armed groups more than police, but for Maduro, the colectivos are likened to ‘angels of socialism’.
https://www.aljazeera.com/blogs/americas/2019/05/venezuela-colectivos-190506163125345.html
Thank you for posting that link.
strange times
To defend the true Catholics on here, Pope Francis is the leader of the Catholic Church and was chosen by God through godly election to lead the Church on Earth.
Any negativity from Catholics or non-Catholics should cease, because it is obvious anyone having problems with God’s Elect is not of God, right Catholics?
I am one of God's Elect.
--I Corinthians 10:29b
--II Timothy 2:25
--II Timothy 3:16
Without a doubt, true Catholics believe the Pope is the premier leader of God’s people on Earth and is the only one authorized and allowed to be in such a exalted position by God.
Lest the Church be overpowered by evil forces (which you and I would probably agree cannot ultimately happen), perhaps God will:
1) show the points of heresy mentioned in the letter to be false and after a cleansing, the Church will thereby become stronger and more unified, or
2) God will imbue Pope Francis with the wisdom to "persuade men" with more complete revelation and/or understanding, as well as to "be manifest to God" (As Paul was wont to do) showing that his tenets are not heresies at all.
Perhaps thirdly (3), "something like scales" will "fall from" Pope Francis' eyes, as they did for Saul of Tarsus and the Church will be thereafter be stronger for it.
For the wrong Pope to be chosen, you are implying a majority of Cardinals who voted for him are evil or misled. This cannot happen in God’s Chosen Church.
All True Catholics believe God is manifest in the Pope and the Cardinals and that the Holy Spirit leads them. To believe otherwise means you are not a True Catholic.
I never suggested "the wrong Pope [was] chosen."
I never implied those "who voted for this Pope [were] evil or misled"
I'd say you need to repent of those falsehoods and your smear of me with these claims.
You post:
“It would appear that many of the signatories to the Letter to the Bishops mentioned earlier maintain their good standing as “true Catholics”. They clearly say Pope Francis is a heretic.”
The Pope can never be a heretic and the majority of Cardinals required to elect the Pope cannot be heretics. You claim the signatories are somehow in “good standing.” They, and apparently you, due to your value statement of their “good standing” while calling the Pope a heretic, think God allowed someone not of God to become the leader of all Christians in the world as Pope. This is heretical.
Please explain to us how you can call Pope accusers Catholics in any sort of “good standing.” No Pope should have to stoop to anyone, especially Catholics who are doubting the Pope or whom believe the Pope needs to explain things, as you state in your own words:
“2) God will imbue Pope Francis with the wisdom to “persuade men” with more complete revelation and/or understanding, as well as to “be manifest to God” (As Paul was wont to do) showing that his tenets are not heresies at all.
Perhaps thirdly (3), “something like scales” will “fall from” Pope Francis’ eyes...”
For the wrong Pope to be chosen, you are implying a majority of Cardinals who voted for him are evil or misled. This cannot happen in God’s Chosen Church.
...........................................
Well I’m sorry to have to inform you, but any accurate history of the papacy will reveal the CofC has many times chosen one of Satan’s minions to undermine the mission of the Universal Church.
Then you are saying the Catholic Church is not led by God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.