Posted on 05/08/2019 10:49:11 PM PDT by bitt
We now know without a doubt the former President Barack Obama was in on the Deep State’s actions to spy on President Trump and entrap his team members. We don’t know how much spying and attempts of entrapment went on, but we do know Obama was aware of it all.
Democrats and Deep State dirty cops have claimed for months that there was no spying on the Trump campaign. Now we know without a doubt that there was not only spying, but the dirty cops in the Deep State attempted to entrap Trump team members through this spying. We also know without a doubt that Obama was in on it.
We know Obama was in on it based on numerous pieces of information.
For starters we know that Obama spied on numerous people for years while he was President. Obama took the US Intelligence community and corrupted it. He used the US intelligence apparatus to spy on anyone and everyone and especially his enemies. We put a list of the many individuals and entities Obama spied on that we know of here.
We also know that Hillary’s long lost emails were found in the White House. This was reported by Judicial Watch in April 2019 –
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Not a smidgen of scandal
Yes. And thankfully we have an AG who is prepared and skilled enough to follow through I believe.
I am cautiously optimistic on that, and I'm trying my best to keep my impatience and frustrations in check.
Flashback: Maxine Waters revealed Obama’s ‘secret database’ that had ‘everything on everyone’
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/privacy/domestic-surveillance/maxine-waters-obama-database.htm
Did Obama spy on Hillary and did they steal Hillary’s emails?
Nobody stole Hillary's emails. She left them around on her server (tried to destroy them, but FBI has them under guard, and backups were on Weiner's laptop... FBI secured that too). Podesta's emails got out... he clicked on a phishing email. The DNC's emails got out... likely given to Wikileaks by Seth Rich.
Obama probably spied on all of Hillary's opponents, but he had no reason to spy on her. He and she came to an understanding long before then.
DJT: “I’m going to be allowing declassification pretty soon...”
“I’m going to be doing it very soon, far more than you
would have even thought...”
“I will be declassifying yes, everything.”
https://youtu.be/jFgvQ97_uxQ?t=617
Interview: Catherine Herridge of Fox News Interviews
Donald Trump - May 2, 2019
Enjoy!
From the beginning
~Easy
____________________
Please do it NOW and definitely before you plan on attending any unsafe event... aka JFK in Dallas event.
Unfortunately, you are correct sir. I hope a bunch of deep staters take up residence in the big house, and that if nothing else, I hope someone has the gonads, to call the sh!t faced Obunghole, an unindicted co conspirator. That may be about the best we can hope for, because he is NOT going down. I wish he was, but it’s not going to happen.
"Get me dirt on Penguin books so I can shake them down for big books on my book contract."
"Lois Lerner loved that dirt you got on conservatives."
"And get me the IRS files of Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi."
=================================
“We’re looking at a potential constitutional crisis.... a sitting president and his henchmen used top secret intel
intended to safeguard and protect the country ........to get dirt on the opposition for political purposes."
Michael Doran, former NSC senior director: “somebody blew a hole in the wall between national security secrets and partisan politics, a stream of information that was supposed to be hermetically sealed from politics." The Obama administration found a way to blow a hole in that wall.”
Doran charged that potential serious crimes were undertaken because “this is a leaking of signal intelligence.” “That’s a felony; you can get 10 years for that. It is a tremendous abuse of the system. We’re not supposed to be monitoring American citizens. “This is now using national intelligence assets and capabilities to spy on the elected, yet-to-be-seated president.”
Bigger than the Obama crimes, is the breach of public trust.
PROOF POSITIVE THAT OBAMA KNEW
Obama’s CYA maneuver of January 3, 2017-——the signing of NSA Data-Sharing Order Section 2.3 by AG Lynch —— is the coupe d’etat to blow out The Deep State. Obama’s after-the-fact ex/order contains some unusual language particularly the convoluted language WRT “The Strategic Delay of Section 2.3 of Obama’s Executive Order 12333”:
NOTE WELL: Prior to the formal signing of Section 2.3, greater latitude ALREADY existed within the White House in regards to collection of information – especially in relation to the Trump Campaign. However, once signed, Section 2.3 granted broad latitude to inter-agency sharing of information.
But by the time Obama’s new executive order was signed on January 3, 2017, all that information was already in the possession of Obama White House.
Thus, Susan Rice’s January 20, 2017 email to herself takes on an even greater significance b/c no one was ever supposed to know about the REAL meaning of Obama’s retroactive CYA.....until Rice stupidly laid it all out in an official email.
==================================================<
When Susan Rice stupidly wrote a CYA memo to herself, she inadvertently confessed to a series of crimes that added the time line and inferences about what the outgoing Obama administration illegally concealed from incoming President Trump and his aides.
CYA memos are rarely a good idea. Most often, they reveal things the author never intended——ala Susan Rice’s now-infamous email to herself.
cont
cont
powerlineblog.com
WHY SUSAN RICE WROTE AN EMAIL TO HERSELF........the extraordinary email Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote to herself at 12:15 on January 20, 2017........within minutes of President Trump’s inauguration must have been her last act, more or less, before she vacated the White House. So obviously the email was important to her. But why would it be important to send an email to herself (the only person copied was one of her aides)?
If you read the email, along with Senator Grassley’s letter to Rice, it is obvious that it is a CYA memo. But the question is, whose A is being C’d?
Most attention, so far, has focused on the first two paragraphs of the email, which describe a meeting that occurred around two weeks earlier.
The participants included
<><>Barack Obama,
<><>Joe Biden,
<><>James Comey,
<><> Sally Yates–who turns up like a bad penny whenever skulduggery is afoot–
<><>and Rice:
Rice made sure to underscore that Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book”. Rice writes Obama stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.
This is pure boilerplate.
It represents, obviously, the company line. But Rice did not write her email to cover Barack Obama’s rear end. If she or anyone else had wanted to document the claim that Obama said to proceed “by the book,” the appropriate course would have been an official memo that copied others who were present and would have gone into the file. (My guess is that such a memo was written, but we haven’t seen it.)
The important part of the email is not the paragraph that purports to exonerate Obama, but the paragraphs that follow: “From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”
The next paragraph of the email remains classified and has been redacted. The email concludes:
The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.
CONCLUSION Why did Susan Rice send herself an email purporting to document this part of the meeting? Because she was C’ing her own A. Rice was nervous about the fact that, at the president’s direction, she had failed to “share information fully as it relates to Russia” with President Trump’s incoming national security team.
Her actions violated longstanding American tradition. Outgoing administrations have always cooperated in the transition to a new administration, whether of the same or the opposing party, especially on matters relating to national security.
Susan Rice is far from the brightest bulb on the tree, but she was well aware that by concealing facts ostensibly relating to national security from her counterpart in the new administration–General Michael Flynn–she was, at a minimum, violating longstanding civic norms.
If she actually lied to Flynn, she could have been accused of much worse. So Rice wanted to be able to retrieve her email, if she found herself in a sticky situation, and tell the world that she hid relevant facts about Russia from the new administration on Barack Obama’s orders.
What were the secrets that Obama wanted to keep from the new administration? We can easily surmise that the fact that the Steele memo was paid for by the Democratic Party; that the FBI had to some degree collaborated with Steele; that the Clinton campaign had fed some of the fake news in the dossier to Steele; and that Comey’s FBI had used Steele’s fabrications as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign were among the facts that Obama and his minions didn’t want Michael Flynn and Donald Trump to know. Susan Rice, we can infer, was told to keep these secrets, and if anyone ever asked why she had failed to disclose them to Michael Flynn and others on Trump’s team, or even lied to those people, she would have the defense that President Obama ordered her to do it.
There may be more to it than this. The redacted paragraph likely contains more information about what it was that Rice wasn’t supposed to tell the Trump team. One of these days, we will learn what was blacked out.
The fact that Michael Flynn was Susan Rice’s counterpart in the incoming administration may also be significant. We know that the FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn–even Peter Strzok!–reported that they didn’t think he had lied about anything. And yet, Obama’s DOJ and Bob Mueller’s “investigation”–basically a continuation of Obama’s corrupt Department of Justice under another, less accountable name–persecuted Flynn to the point where he finally pled guilty to a single count of lying to the FBI in order, as he says, to end the madness and the financial drain.
Why were the Democrats so determined to discredit General Flynn? Perhaps because they wanted to pre-empt any outrage that may otherwise have followed on revelations that the Obama administration’s National Security Advisor hid important facts from her successor during the transition, and may have lied to him about those facts, in violation of all American tradition.
Nixon took the fall....but we still do not know what exactly the Democrats were up to that prompted Nixon to take the extreme actions he did.
“Obama took the US Intelligence community and corrupted it. “
...and the IRS, and the BLM, and... (fill-in your favorites).
Face it, our socialist former president corrupted & politicized everything he touched.
We have surmised as much from the beginning and I have been saying for a year now that the reason no one will go to jail for #FusionCollusion is because they can’t light that fuse because it burns right back to HIllary and 0bama. Notice how Barr hasn’t arrested anyone? He’s “studying” the problem. That’s DC speak for ain’t gonna do nothing.
Being a Beach Boys Fan, I like it. All news should be delivered over a Beach Boys sound track.
...and this very denial of reality is what destroyed the once mighty USA.
Just what info does “our new AG” require that WE DON’T ALREADY HAVE in order to get him off his ass. Sorry, I ain’t buying horse shit today. Barr is there to cover the Deep State, which is just what he’s doing. What does he NOT know that WE do?
Quel supris!
Yates,that POS, showed up this weekend in an interview citing DJT for obstruction. If anyone obstructed justice it was her. She got her ass out of DC and is hiding out in some Atlanta law firm from what I gather. I look fondly on the day she visits a scaffold in the navy yard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.