Posted on 05/02/2019 10:28:23 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I think they should set it at less than 100, since most women’s T counts are between 15 and 70. Strict, but fair.
Find someone to read the articles to you slowly. Also to read out the text from the Sun article, that I put directly in my post. Also look up, never mind, have someone else look up “intersex” and chromosomes and explain to you, as slowly as needed, that intersex individuals do not have XX chromosomes.
I admire that you manage, despite your profound learning-disability, to operate a keyboard, but it’s never wrong to ask for help. You’re so brave (means not scared).
Google “Caster Semenya Internal Testes”
Your not very bright.
Not much sense arguing with someone who gets their information from tabloids.
Carry on, Mr. Schiff.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
https://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Media_Release_Semenya_ASA_IAAF_decision.pdf
Semenya’s intersex/XY condition, which is is widely known, is directly addressed (as 46 X/Y DSD) in the referenced court decision. ( But maybe the court’s press release is really a “tabloid” )
Fortunately the athletics court is taking some action to keep XY intersex athletes like Semenya from competing unmedicated against females.
It seems to disappoint the left-wing gender-fluidity fans here, but it’s for the best.
I was really commenting on aberration of how much testosterone she produced but as more was revealed about her I can say whether or not she is a female.
I do NOT support non-females competing against females.
Her case is not so obvious as the gender fluid males who compete. Who I do not support.
Athletes like Semenya will medicate down just enough to slip under the limit.
Meanwhile what do real women do — medicate up to the limit? That’s really their only option to be competitive.
And apparently the allowed women’s T limit is still well above what an actual XX female would have. But it is still better than nothing, like when Semenya and the other intersex non-females were allowed to compete with as much T as their testes produced against actual XX females. That was the rule in effect for the infamous 2016 Olympic women’s 800 meters. (zero medals to females)
Better would be to ban intersex entirely from women’s sports. Should be female only.
Agree.
I see it heading towards tiered levels of femaleness. Something like “normal”, “dyke”, and “freak”. Those terms wouldn’t be used but they’d be the basic categories.
Sounds harsh but I don’t know how you’d get level playing fields otherwise.
Meanwhile mens sports is unaffected by the issue because max natural testosterone is always allowed as the potential, if no probable, winner.
well, I suppose if you think that the body is like a sports car, and all the racers should have to compete with identical cars.
We could also have leagues based on height, so that shorter people can win without having to compete against taller people, since it is hard to change your height successfully.
Or, we could just understand that everybody is unique, and it is likely that the top 1% of athletes have many genetic advantages over the rest of us, and that is part of what makes them great athletes, and that still, much of what makes someone able to compete successfully is training, getting into shape, learning the skillsets needed. This is more clear in sports that require a more varied set of skills (like baseball, football, soccer) than a sport like running, where the method to achieve the goal is much simpler.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.