She should be interviewed for 40 hours under oath, on Clinton Foundation operations, to see if she is guilt of perjury, just like Trump associates.
I doubt she's guilty of perjury. She's just politically connected, and not too bright. Here's my reasoning:
Chelsea was so dumb she didn't realize what the family business really was--influence peddling with laundering through the Clinton Foundation. As revealed in WikiLeaks, Doug Band complained that Chelsea had brought in some outside professionals to look into the foundation business. They thought there was some fishy business going on... so Chelsea concluded that some foundation employees were taking advantage of Bill's fame to profit. In fact, that was precisely the point.
Doug Band said, "Who does she think paid for her apartment and her wedding?"
And, get this: her Ph.D. Oxford thesis was done on the operation and conduct of philanthropic foundations. One of her main conclusions was that sometimes the purpose and conduct of these foundations is influenced by their major donors. Ya think?