The hill's krysal balls------------"Evidence? LOL! Really Joe. You think we give two craps about evidence?" You see, they toss some excrement out there against the wall and it sticks. Then the onus is on the accused to disprove their claim of whatever. Better call saul, alinsky, that is.
1 posted on
04/28/2019 11:41:32 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
They appear to be going way out of their way to Discredit Barr and severly damage his credibility ion the upcoming Trials for Treason, which if I understand Adam Schiff, is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. LOCK HER UP!!
2 posted on
04/28/2019 11:50:41 AM PDT by
eyeamok
To: rktman
I did one of my rare vantities a week or so ago on this. It’s really to dissect - if Barr TESTIFIES that there was spying going on, it means either that there really was spying going on, or Barr wants to spend the next 10 years of his life in jail for perjury - and for what, to make Trump ‘look good’, oh please.
When you boil it down to that, it becomes VERY OBVIOUS as to what happened.
6 posted on
04/28/2019 12:10:08 PM PDT by
BobL
(I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
To: rktman
WOW! Someone asked me just a few days ago, if I trusted Joe DiGenova. I told them then that I trusted him more than anyone else in media. Boy was I every right! :)
To: rktman
Echo chamber says lie, you say lie.
Modern day journalism ethics #101.
12 posted on
04/28/2019 2:10:37 PM PDT by
blackdog
To: rktman
Krystal Ball. If this is her, she may be worth the effort to turn from the Dark Side.
15 posted on
04/29/2019 6:18:09 AM PDT by
PLMerite
("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson