One thing about Hannity that ticks me off is his “99.9% of FBI being honest” line. I was listening to his show Friday and finally heard two guests call BS on his take. I believe one was Peter Schweitzer. Both put the figure at 20% in the tank for DS/democrats. I think 20% compromised would probably be about right.
I know what you mean. I wish the other 80% would get a little more pro-active about defending the integrity of the FBI. That will take more than just keeping themselves clean.
“I think 20% compromised would probably be about right.”
I’d go 30-40% based on nothing more than my knowledge of human nature.
I too get nauseated by Hannity’s “99’9%” claim which is wishful thinking; thinking not being one of Hannity’s strong talents.
20 points is consistent with the Pareto Optimal rule. Certainly that 20 might be 10 or 8, but it is not a tiny fraction of a percent.
With many in high leadership roles due to 8 years of Clinton, 8 years of no weeding out under Bush, and 8 years of Obama.
I agree with st least 20%.
There was a retired CIA officer on Laura Ingraham yesterday that explained how the rank and file turned liberal under Clinton. He said that it was neutral in the 80’s.