According to Levin, no. I just downloaded it here and the only references I can find in a quick search are reference to “allegations”, “Steele reports”, “Steele material” and “Steele reporting”.
The word “dossier” is not used, as though the Steele Dossier was merely a spurious reference (rather than the burden of proof for FISC warrants).
It mentions the Carter Page FISC warrant as “probable cause finding was based on a different (and lower) standard” but does not elaborate in a quick search.
I’ll spend more time looking at it later, but the overview by Rush yesterday that I heard in between work appears 100% accurate: It’s a roadmap for the dems to continue their assault based upon spurious allegations.
My own quick, cursory overview is that the report intentionally-omits analysis of the key points which obviously now mandate a new investigation. IMHO.
https://app.box.com/s/z58m43zivrs28891t6vskox78yapbbw1
Thank you for the reply.
I’m sure that Barr must have noticed the absence of many key terms and other points of evidence pertaining to the collusion story that were conveniently absent in the report. He clearly see’s the “report” for what it is.
None of this was lost on Barr and in fact is probably motivating him to dig into the genesis of this obviously politically inspired investigation. Some very bad news will soon be raining down on members of the cabal. Democrats all.