I am trying to figure out that “10 instances of possible Trump obstruction”. It is CNBC headline as well. Guess that is the media and Democrat talking point?
When we finally see the report, it will probably turn out that the 10 instances were probably tweets that called it a "witch hunt". In the Mueller mind, criticism is possible obstruction.
What's most important though, is that none of the 10 instances were enough to make a charge. It's all just one more attempt to smear the president with innuendo when the facts don't go their way.
Curious (but not really) they ignore the parts about Trump’s cooperation during the investigation and his not exercising Exec redaction privilege or Barr objectively reviewing the statue criteria was not met.