Posted on 04/17/2019 7:36:51 AM PDT by Boomer
It is indeed a soft, but nonetheless effective invasion.
One of the bothersome things about Trump sending immigrants to sanctuary cities is that both our domestic and the SA MSM can describe such relocation in a way that advances their agenda.
Unbelievably, short of closing the border and hoping to spark Mexican government border enforcement, he doesn't have many options. He cannot detain them indefinitely nor can he promptly deport them. In this narrow context, he/we/the nation, is screwed.
Advertisements cost money. Who is paying the bill??
It'd be a real shame if the buildings where these groups meet were to mysteriously collapse at opportune times. I don't care if that means taking out several square blocks of Mexico City.
President Hussein had agents and offices in Central America advertising all the welfare benefits that would be showered on uneducated unskilled Latinos if they only could get across the US border. I bet they are still there still working.
I don’t sweat the money being sent back. I stay angry at the welfare that is showered on the beggars from south of the border. Remittances should, however, be taxed to support border security.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.