Replies

To: philman_36; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

28 posted on 04/13/2019 8:34:47 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!)

Sorry for the writing errors. I'm really rather PO'd at this flimsy 'excuse'.

Perhaps an excuse to get him to the US, but an excuse nonetheless.

30 posted on 04/13/2019 8:46:37 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)

Regarding this...Assange Affidavit Page 13 A. Assange was "NF"
45. At her court-martial proceeding, Manning claimed that she believed the individual with whom she was chatting "was likely Mr. Julian Assange, Mr. Daniel Schmidt, or a proxy representative of Mr. Assange and Mr. Schmidt." That's neither evidence nor proof, that's Manning's belief!
The rest of the stuff there is assumptions and/or hearsay, not facts, from Megan Brown.
And the snowball started rolling downhill.

I call more BS from RR's co-worker! (yeah, Google those two names together)

36 posted on 04/16/2019 2:16:58 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794