Replies

The wording of the statute here is as crystal clear as the statute giving Trump authority to ban immigration from any country he deemed necessary was.

Yet there were still Federal judges in Hawaii and Washington state willing to issue injunctions against Trump exercising his right under the law because of his "thoughts" on the matter. (I believe one of the opinions said something about "beyond the four corners" of the paper (Executive Order))

Time to appeal this to a Federal judge to get a preliminary injunction because of the Ways and Means Chairman's motivations behind obtaining these tax records.

The Ways and Means committee is not investigating any possible crime and need the returns as evidence. They are simply fishing for anything they can pin on Trump, which is an abuse of power.

The wording of Article [IV] (Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure), U. S. Constitution is also crystal clear. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

What the Dems are doing violates the President's rights under the 4th Amendment. They have no honest basis to demand all his tax and business records prior to becoming president.