Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thud
My point is that there is definitely still some wiggle room in whether states can require electors to vote in a particular way. I'm sure that state laws requiring electors to vote for the national popular vote winner will be challenged in court AND ignored by at least some Republican electors whatever the courts rule.

It's far simpler than that. Each state has a slate of electors for each candidate. If Ohio laws is changed to say that the slate of candidates for the winner of the national popular vote is the slate that is allowed to cast Ohio's votes then what is to prevent them?

147 posted on 04/02/2019 12:28:22 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
THIS will happen to all the Democrats who vote for that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW-NiGp1gys

Which is every bit as likely that Ohio's legislature will do that.

149 posted on 04/02/2019 3:13:05 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson