Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fury
"Obstruction of justice charge would not likely lead to conviction."

Basically what Comey claimed when he said "no reasonable prosecutor" would bring a case against Clinton for emails. The difference is that Mueller was a special counsel, and Comey usurped the power of a prosecutor to make that determination on Clinton. Big difference. I still hope that bastard hangs for overreaching his authority.

263 posted on 03/24/2019 1:11:11 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th

Gee, thanks FNC. I was wondering what Donna Brazile thought about all this (not).


269 posted on 03/24/2019 1:12:33 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

To: mass55th

I guess my concern is that Mueller’s job is not to exonerate anyone. Either charge or not charge.

So if that is the case, why did Mueller write (based on Barr’s letter) in regards to OoJ that the report “does not exonerate him (President Trump)”?


291 posted on 03/24/2019 1:19:02 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson