They will pounce on the obstruction charge as inconclusive. But it only looks like a Trump weakness by contrast with the definitive “No collusion” statement. I never expected anything that exculpatory. I thought that Mueller would, at best, say that nothing could be proven. “No evidence” is as strong a conclusion as you can get.
They will pounce on the obstruction charge as inconclusive. But it only looks like a Trump weakness by contrast with the definitive “No collusion” statement.While Mueller was weak in his obstruction findings, I found Barr's wording almost a slap at Mueller, reciting basic LAW 101: if there is no evidence of a crime, there can be no obstruction. Pretty simple, and many here have said that about the obstruction charge from day 1.