Posted on 03/13/2019 3:25:07 AM PDT by BadLands59
Then there are these recent comments from Lara Logan:
freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3730938/post
What about a bill to protect us from loud mouthed, obnoxious democrats?
Bullstalin. Obama locked up filmmakers he disapproved of and spied on a journalist’s computer.
We still don’t know the full extent of the kenyan’s spying on journalists. Sheryl Attkisson was on Hannity a while back talking about her case. She still doesn’t know exactly what happened to her, exactly who assaulted her, etc. Scary stuff.
So, they want to make it illegal to whip up on a presstitute doing a Murphy job
A journalist gets in a fight at a bar. Before he gets clocked, he yells, “I’m a journalist!” Will this law give him special protection? Will assaulting a journalist be worse than assaulting a non-journalist? Will “journalist crime” be an aggravating factor, like “hate crime?”
Joun-O-Lists are going to become a supremely privileged Super Class if the Dems ever get hold of both Houses and POTUS again.
I am as sure of that as I am they are going to expand SCOTUS and pack it with Leftists.
This is to prevent clymers and ratherbiaseds from getting gutpunched by DNC officials at the next Democrat Convention.
If Republicans were smart (which I know they’re not, of course), they’d load this up with poison pills like provisions making it easier for people to sue journalists for false and/or malicious reporting (”since it makes it easier for people to use legal routes instead of violence”), and the like.
Make it so toxic the Dems will run from it.
The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat along with the Democrat Thug Party.
I’d almost like to see this bill passed, so long as it only specified actual violence be committed against a journalist, and not vacuous threats via twitter, etc.
Then send a hundred conservative journalists into liberal conclaves around the country and let them ask serious questions. About half of them would be beaten senseless, I suspect, but could then hire the Covington lawyer, Wood, and sue them into oblivion.
Of course, the real reason the Dems want a bill like this isn’t to protect against real violence; it’s to shut down free speech. Criticize a journalist, a la Trump, and you’ll be in violation.
These are stupid laws which merely needlessly expand federal court calendars.
Assaulting someone, anyone is a crime on the books in any state. “Journalists” nor anyone else needs a special law to prosecute someone for assaulting ANYONE.
As for “intimidation”, a “free press” has a right to “print” whatever they want. HOWEVER, constitutionally that right provides NO right to any particular information, from anyone.
And, anyone NOT wanting certain information “reported” has a right to try to keep that information from being reported, by any otherwise legal means available.
Some means may seem “intimidating” to the “reporter”, but whether or not that is true needs to be left to, and tested in, the courts, not to some law that attempts to use a non-transparent term like “intimidation” as some sort of transparent legal term, which it is not. There too many ways in which “intimidation” is a subjective matter. With such a subjective term, the DOJ gets a non-transparent law in which “intimidation” becomes whatever the prosecutor says it is.
You see, the Dims want the DOJ prosecutors to have the flexibility to pretend that any form of PERSUASION is “intimidation”. Subjectively, any form of “persuasion” can become classed as “intimidation”, by the receiver, as soon they reject the persuasion offered.
If the Press consisted of 95% Conservatives and / or Republicans, this Bill would never make it out of Committee.
Oh look, another Protected Class of People who have more Rights than everyone else.
We ALL know that someone at the FBI invited CNN along to raid Roger Stone’s house because he supports Trump. Why is no one in jail?
Why is no one on their side EVER charged with anything??
It may mean that the Clintons cannot murder anyone who displeases them.
I may be wrong but I think I read somewhere that murder is already illegal.
No State shall . . . grant any Title of Nobility.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
IOW, the Congress has no authority to make journalists into nobility, or priests, having rights unavailable to the people generally.Anyone can decide to be a journalist. Congress has no authority to decide who is not a journalist. The rights of journalists are rights of the people.
I realize that that goes against the McConnell v. FEC decision validating McCain-Feingold - but then, even Justice Kennedy voted against the FEC in that decision, which was 5-4 the wrong way because O’Connell decided it wrong.
And as Antonin Scalia pointed out, “the freedom . . . of the press” is not absolute freedom of the press but the freedom enjoyed by the press at the time the First Amendment was adopted. Freedom which was, and is, limited. Limited by, for example, laws against libel.
Democrats are proposing a law favoring the journalism establishment, because the journalism establishment is joined at the hip with the Democrat Party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.