Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Big mistake - 1% ethanol is too much!


5 posted on 03/12/2019 6:37:28 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Hecks

Ethanol only makes fiscal sense for as long as it is subsidized. It makes no sense whatsoever from a net energy “savings”, as the cost of actually processing fuel-grade ethanol per BTU produced exceeds straight unleaded gasoline by a good margin. Ethanol has a LOWER total amount of BTU’s per gallon than gasoline, requiring a GREATER amount to extract the same energy.

Henry Ford, a great apostle of mechanizing the American farm industry, was very positive about the virtues of pure, or at least high-content ethanol mixes as “home-grown” fuel sources for spark-ignition internal combustion engines, much like the horses the gasoline engine replaced could be fed year-around with home-grown hay and oats. But perhaps the years of anti-alcohol agitation, which culminated in the Prohibition experiment, took all the practical aspects of ethanol production off the table. For a number of years, it was simply illegal to distill alcohol from fermented grains.


29 posted on 03/12/2019 7:34:46 PM PDT by alloysteel (Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson