Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird; BroJoeK; DoodleDawg
It seems strange too that he would be against abolition in areas the Union controlled, yet by his own words, he was: “I am a little uneasy about the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia” Lincoln March 24 1862 in a letter to Horace Greeley, New York Tribune editor

Stop quoting out of context. A fuller version of the quote is:

I am a little uneasy about the abolishment of slavery in this District, not but I would be glad to see it abolished, but as to the time and manner of doing it. If some one or more of the border-states would move fast, I should greatly prefer it; but if this can not be in a reasonable time, I would like the bill to have the three main features---gradual---compensation---and vote of the people---

In other words, Lincoln was all for emancipation in the District of Columbia. Lincoln had propose abolition in the District years before when he was a Congressman. But he had some scruples about how emancipation was going to be implemented by the 1862 legislation.

I still don't enjoy this. These misquotes are a big reason why.

87 posted on 03/10/2019 5:53:02 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: x

Lincoln was quite clear that he was no abolitionist and that the North did not go to war over slavery. The Northern dominated US Congress passed a resolution in 1861 saying exactly that.


88 posted on 03/10/2019 5:58:27 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson