You do come up with some of the most asinine theories I’ve ever seen. Must be some kind of gift.
I tell you things you don't like. You refuse to believe them because you don't like them, not because you can factually refute them.
No special case law, no special case for this sort of "property."
Let's see. Doodle Dawg has proffered the theory that unless the Confederate Constitution explicitly allows "free states", they don't exist.
I pointed this out about the US Constitution first. How do you grasp the concept for the Confederate Constitution, but think it is an asinine theory when I use the exact same argument about the US Constitution?
Why is it asinine when I apply your own argument to the US Constitution circa 1789-1861?