Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird
Why not just accept the North's offer of slavery effectively forever by express constitutional amendment?

By the time the Corwin Amendment passed congress, 7 states had already announced themselves to be a different country. They couldn't even consider the amendment without admitting that they were, in fact, still part of the United States and that secession had been a charade, something southern pride would not accept. It was a Catch-22 in that sense.

457 posted on 03/26/2019 12:15:43 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Or it could be that what they wanted was to run their own affairs without sending 40% of their export revenue to New York, and God only knows how much of the rest to Washington DC.

Always left out of these discussions is the fact that these two cities were collecting *MOST* of the money produced by the South.

Same two f***ing cities that are still trying to control the rest of us today.

463 posted on 03/26/2019 1:24:38 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

If slavery and protection thereof had been the big issue to them, slavery by express constitutional amendment would have addressed those concerns.

Let’s run through the math again.

15 slaveholding states at the time. 3/4s of all states required to pass a constitutional amendment. Ergo, to abolish slavery at some future date, it would take 45 states voting to pass that future amendment over the objections of the 15 slaveholding states. 45 + 15 = 60. How many states are in the US currently? The answer is of course 50. Ie not even close to enough.

Slavery would have been irrevocable without the approval of the slaveholding states. They could do basic math back then too. They all understand it would have meant slavery effectively forever. Yet the original 7 seceding states turned it down. If it was “all about slavery” why would they?


464 posted on 03/26/2019 1:31:30 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson