You forgot the period. Or maybe you’ve just missed your period.
At any rate, I’m not surprised that you feeeeeeel your rejoinder a blistering blow. Yours has been the worst, the laziest, and the most slipshod of scholarship - why shouldn’t it also be drenched in self adulation?
I invariably find it laughable when someone heaves a heavy sigh and states in haughty tone that “I’m not going to do your research for you!” The fact that you can’t (or won’t) back your statements demonstrates your lack of sincerity.
But, being a curious feller, I am roused to the hunt.
You’ve posted this excerpt (your post #226) before. It obviously holds value to you or your desperate agenda. How strongly do you support it? Is it of sufficient weight to merit attribution?
You provide no quotes, facts or sources. You simply have a temper tantrum and hurl childish insults. That is why I respond to you in kind. Its the only thing your pea brain capable of understanding obviously.
As for me I've provided all sorts of facts, quotes and statements. What I will not do is be your - or anybody else's google monkey. It is not for you or for those on your side to pose every question and then sit in judgment as to whether or not the answer provided is "acceptable". We both know it never will be. Then of course, I'll be told to spend vast amounts more time coming up with yet more quotes and sources. Even if these are bulletproof then the game will move on to "oh well in that case I don't trust your sources." When that can no longer be argued, the next gambit is to claim that its "irrelevant".
You act as though I've never seen trolling before. Those who try to play this little game are obviously not acting in good faith.
stick to the playground insults though. You're apparently not bright enough to even play this simply Trolling 101 game DoodleDawg tries so hard at.