Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
The existing state-by-state requirements probably cost them more in added infrastructure to operate the "in-state" process across multiple states.

The state-specific requirements add some cost but the real cost is in negotiating with and managing a network of providers and in marketing and customer service.

The big providers, United, Anthem, Aetna, etc., have already consolidated their back office operations nationwide (e.g. IT, accounting, claims processing) so entering a new state is pretty easy - just come up with the provider network, marketing and support infrastructure - which they would have to do even if there was no regulation.

What keeps the big players out of a given state is their business decision that they won't make enough money there, and it isn't because of regulation.

76 posted on 03/07/2019 8:54:42 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo
"What keeps the big players out of a given state is their business decision that they won't make enough money there, and it isn't because of regulation."

They already do this on a county-by-county basis within a state. Doing the same thing on a state-by-state basis is a trivial addition. And I would bet that regulation IS a big part of it.

Deregulate and see who succeeds in competition.

87 posted on 03/07/2019 10:20:42 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson