I cant agree with your point on the constitution. I doubt he knows that much about what the founders meant when they wrote it.
The funny part is, that he is against any foreign military interventions, which I might agree with on some points, but he is against any defense/security against foreign invasions.
How the hell does that make any sense?
Not sure which word of mine you disagreed with. I agree with you that Rand doesn't get the Constitution at all--as in "throwing the Constitution out with the bath water."
Freegards, in any case.