Seems like Paul’s issue is with the bill that Congress passed back in 1976. You can question the wisdom of that bill, but not try to claim that Trump is doing something unconstitutional by acting in accordance with it.
Also, of course, this is a legit national sovereignty emergency and the dollars are a pittance on a relative scale. I see zero excuse for constitutionally disputing the president’s right to follow through as he has described.
What’s up with his vote here?
I fully agree with you and as for what’s up with this vote?
I’m not sure as far as each RINO voting for the resolution, I would guess they’re no different than the Rats when it comes to wanting open borders.
Of course they don’t want to come right out and say it so they try to use the constitutional excuse but they’re dead wrong, it’s constitutional because they gave the presidency the power of the emergency declaration.