Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don W; newgeezer

Thank you for posting it. Wow does the media ever exaggerate! I wager she’s more angry about the text than the image but the media made it out to be all about the image.

Still wish he could be able to fight this - it needs to be done for the sake of all Americans to stop judges in the future. 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment, 6th Amendment rights are all violated by one bench edict. This should not be allowed to stand.

In light of the recent SCOTUS ruling, 9-0, rejecting excessive seizure of assets there is a logical connection that such a total ban is likewise excessive.

And if I read the ruling it even seems to indicate that neither you, nor I, can even speak about it! She writes “no statements can be made on his behalf by... even “many volunteers”. I’ve never met Stone, never communicated with him, have nothing whatsoever to do with the case but I can’t go on the courthouse steps or on TV to talk about it?


40 posted on 02/21/2019 2:20:31 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: monkeyshine

And what is Roger going to do? Unfairly prejudice his OWN trial?


44 posted on 02/21/2019 2:31:31 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson