[MAGAthon]

the gloBULL warming mob are dangerous:

21 Feb: BBC: Climate change: Ban gas grid for new homes ‘in six years’
By Roger Harrabin
In cities, new housing estates and flats should be kept warm by networks of hot water, says the report.
The water could be heated by waste heat from industry.
An alternative approach is to use heat pumps, which draw warmth from the sea or lakes; or burn gas from waste.

The report, from the independent Committee on Climate Change, recommends these changes are made to new homes at first because it’s much more economical that way. They say it costs £4,800 to install low-carbon heating in a new home, but £26,300 in an existing house.
What’s more, these systems will only work if homes are insulated to the highest standards so they need little heating…

The chair of the Committee, Lord Deben, is being investigated by the Lords Standards Committee to see if he has breached rules by not declaring income from firms that benefit from pro-active climate policies. Lord Deben says he has followed advice on the rules.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47306766

go Trump. time to expose the phony science behind the gloBULL warming hoax:

20 Feb: GWPF: from WaPo: White House Readies Panel To Assess If Climate Change Poses A National Security Threat
The proposed Presidential Committee on Climate Security is being spearheaded by William Happer, a National Security Council senior director.
The White House is working to assemble a panel to assess whether climate change poses a national security threat, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post, a conclusion that federal intelligence agencies have affirmed several times since President Trump took office.

The proposed Presidential Committee on Climate Security, which would be established by executive order, is being spearheaded by William Happerr, a National Security Council senior director. Happer, an emeritus professor of physics at Princeton University, has said that carbon emissions linked to climate change should be viewed as an asset rather than a pollutant...
https://www.thegwpf.com/white-house-readies-panel-to-assess-if-climate-change-poses-a-national-security-threat/

[Svartalfiar]

In cities, new housing estates and flats should be kept warm by networks of hot water, says the report. The water could be heated by waste heat from industry.

Heat waste from industry? So now they want you to live right next to the industrial part of town? Or do they somehow expect hot water to just travel around town and not cool down at all as it moves through pipes laid in freezing ground?

An alternative approach is to use heat pumps, which draw warmth from the sea or lakes; or burn gas from waste.

Seas and lakes are not that warm... and how does a 'heat pump' move the heat around? A water pump? with the same issues as above, only starting with not hot water? And burning waste? Isn't the whole point of their plan to not burn stuff into the atmosphere? How is burning waste (full of random metals and chemicals) better than burning hydrocarbons?