Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salamander
Maybe they identified as Unwilling Tourists.

Bingo. That has more truth than "Indentured Servants". Slaves are slaves - they didn't willingly sign on as slaves, totally unwilling. Next he'll call them Documented Visitors or some such made-up garbage.

8 posted on 02/10/2019 6:47:49 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: roadcat

Apparently, he’s going to be the gift that keeps on giving.


10 posted on 02/10/2019 6:50:30 PM PST by Salamander (Death makes angels of us all, and give us wings where we once had shoulders, smooth as ravens' claws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: roadcat; Salamander; ProtectOurFreedom; E. Pluribus Unum; Blood of Tyrants; NoLibZone; All

Actually, Northam does seem to know his history. I read the continuation of the article. There was a link to indentured servants which I clicked. The last 2 paragraphs there were very interesting but did not allow me to transfer if off the page. So roughly what it said is when the first Africans were brought to VA in 1619, there were NO slave laws, so they used the laws of indenture, and the Africans had the same rights and responsibilities as did other indentured servants. This included receipt of land after the prescribed period ended successfully. However, settlers began to worry about them getting all this land, so slavery laws were passed in “liberal” Mass. in 1641, but the Virginians did not get around to it until 1661. So in VA, black indenture was the law for 42 years. Sounds like an interesting topic for more research.


97 posted on 02/10/2019 11:01:10 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson