Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Railroads would be going back into the passenger train business if it penciled out.

But it doesn’t. The wonderful passenger service infrastructure that RRs once had was worth investing in when RRs had a virtual monopoly on long distance travel.

Air travel was very expensive then. American highways and autos were a slow option until Eisenhower built the Interstates. This has all changed.

As early as 1920 railroads had 120 mph service between major American cities. They could do it again, but it requires an expensive and continuing investment in roadbed that their current freight service doesn’t.


39 posted on 02/07/2019 12:40:17 PM PST by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham

Passenger rail loses massive amounts of money every time it’s tried in the modern era. Large public subsidies must be built in.

Once it is public, it becomes a target for income redistribution (see Denver RTD recent example). Fares for paying customers go up. Fares for homeless go down, subsidized even more by both taxes and fare-paying customers.

And ridership is falling all over the nation. Uber and Lyft are killing metro area rail. Long distance passenger rail is even less economic.

The only way to make it work is a monopoly caused by shutting down air and auto travel.


117 posted on 02/10/2019 4:15:56 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson