Neither has witnesses to corroborate their versions but unless this was more than a twosome, that's a big DUH!
What was she doing in his hotel room consensually kissing him and going to the bed, if she didn't think more was going to happen? This wasn't church. It was a sexual encounter. She had the green light on the whole way.
A woman who goes to a man's hotel room with him (or vice versa) is tacitly agreeing to some sexual hanky panky. Business meetings can be held in the lobby or the restaurant or bar. But agreeing to go to the hotel room itself is understood to be for privacy for sex.
And how is one forced to perform oral sex? It takes two to tango, as they say, and there had to have been some cooperation on her part for the act to have taken place. Sounds like she just regretted what she'd done afterwards.
I notice the Washington Compost states that they couldn't find, "significant red flags and inconsistencies within the allegations" by the woman but they don't mention the same regarding the denials by Fairfax.
That sounds a little one-sided and biased in favor of the woman's allegations and doesn't give the same credence to the denial of those accusations by Fairfax.
But then this is the Washington Compost, which rivals the New York Slimes for its bias and fakery in their reporting.
TO A MAN’S WAY OF THINKING ITS FOR SEX-———”if” a woman agrees to go to his hotel room.
BUT THAT’S NOT THE WAY A WOMAN THINKS. I agree she was naive to go with him....
But a woman should be able to talk to a man at a convention....and even go to his hotel room to “get some papers”......
without having to worry about being sexually assaulted.
CBS’s Charlie Rose said he appeared in an underlings room stark naked....b/c “he thought” she was coming on to him.
Male ego—constantly needs grooming.
As to how she was forced into oral sex-—he sure as heck had to use his toxic masculinity to make that happen.