Actually, the important part of this story is that Fairfax LIED earlier today in his tweet.
He claimed they found “numerous red flags and inconsistancies” in the woman’s story. This article says that was “incorrect”, and that “the Post did not find “significant red flags and inconsistencies within the allegations,” as the Fairfax statement incorrectly said.”
So now the question should be, why did Fairfax lie about what the Post found?
His tweet suggested that they had discredited her story.
But in fact, the WP simply found nobody who could confirm what happened in a hotel room between two people in private, and couldn’t find anybody willing to suggest he had ever done this to anybody else.
Frankly, they probably were right not to report it, but they clearly used a different standard with Ford and Kavanaugh.
But again, the important takeaway is that Fairfax LIED ABOUT what the Post did. If he lied about that, how do we know he is not lying about what happened in the hotel room?
Why would this liberal black woman from California make up an attack by a liberal black democrat in Virginia? THere is no racial or political motivation to do so.
So if people believe Fairfax, why do they since he lied about the post, and why don’t they believe the woman?
Yes, why lie about what the WaPo said ? Mr. Fairfax, the WaPo is well versed in lying, it’s what they do, don’t muck things up with your amateur efforts, besides, they have your back.
Yes, we must apply the Stolen Valor Blumenthal rule (falsus in uno...).