Back when the country had a sense of humor.
Posted on 01/29/2019 5:12:06 AM PST by Kaslin
So now you’re not a real conservative unless you’re in favor of paying half-naked women to shake it for strange men on the Lord’s day. Also, Oceania has never been at war with Eurasia.
Did I get that right?
You meant the author, Dennis Prager argued, I didn't write the op-ed Sheesch *rme*
Oh sorry. I myself have posted articles from someone else and have been responded to by posters here thinking I wrote it it. But if you disagreed with any of it, you should left a comment at the top.
Evidently that is what Prager and comrades argue. And division is actually requires in Scripture:
Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil (Exodus 23:2 KJV)
Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. (2 Corinthians 6:17-18 KJV)
That is SO cute!
Love it. Like our original BALTIMORE Colts.
Cute, classy.
Might have to support it, even if it is in IRSAY’S Indy.
Leave it to some of the miserable prudes on this thread, and we’ll eventually end up with this but with burqas:
My guess is he would have the cheerleaders covered in foam...
NFL cheerleading as “creepy and demeaning.”
____________________________________________________
Do these same people want to ban pornography?
Back when the country had a sense of humor.
Excuse me but the cheerleaders are just as easy to see as the players. If you can’t see cheerleaders from the stands, I don’t know what magic let’s you see the game any better. They perform on the field during breaks in the game, and they move around to be seen from different locations. If you object to the need for a jumbotron or binoculars, why attend the game?
Good god, what year is this — 1922?
Cheerleaders are conservatively dressed by today;s standards. There are girls at the mall dressed more skimpily than NFL cheerleaders.
The cheerleaders today dress just like the ones at my very Christian college — in the 1970s.
I am sure we can supply burkas if that will satisfy your standards for modesty.
I disagree with the poster, the OlLine Rebel, and have already recommended he/she begin with the burkas he wants cheerleaders to wear.
How I got looped into another discussion I have NO idea.
>>Do these same people want to ban pornography?<<
The western taliban — apparently not limited to the left.
No pun intended?
It’s not just ugly women, the left is very much a radical homosexual movement.
>>It’s not just ugly women, the left is very much a radical homosexual movement.<<
I was speaking about feminazis — but yeah, perverts are the tent pole that maintains the left movement.
The pedophiles are making their move to be normalized and the left is embracing them.
A false dichotomy, and your denigration of those who hold to Christian morals as miserable prudes means you are one with the liberal sexual revolution, and (perhaps) only a conservative in the libertarian or fiscal sense?
That’s a good analogy. Maoist China. Hillary’s would fit right in. She can just bring her current wardrobe.
I made no comment about what you are, only what you allowed to happen to you.
Best,
L
Just EEEEWW!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.