Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1

I don’t know if you’ve ever been to “divorce court” but judges ask all kinds of questions that really are none of their business. They insist they do this in order to “protect” the party born w/o penis.


31 posted on 01/22/2019 6:42:55 AM PST by rhombus10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: rhombus10

I’ve never been to divorce court and don’t see any likelihood of going. However, I hope we will see changes to get away from the tabloid nonsense. One reasonable change would be eliminating these questions when they are not relevant. A second change would be to prosecute for perjury when salacious and false allegations are used to get custody or sympathy alimony. I know far too many men who have been victims of obvious lies - and women who have told obvious lies under oath, either out of anger or to get custody.


38 posted on 01/22/2019 6:52:41 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson