Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lmo56
You are arguing that Ark was born a naturalized citizen, when he war born on U.S. soil. That doesn't make any sense.
123 posted on 01/21/2019 2:09:29 PM PST by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: Widget Jr

Anyone that is not a natural born Citizen(born to U.S. citizen parents on U.S. soil) is a naturalized citizen under positive law. There is no positive law that makes Ark a citizen. SCROTUS got it dead wrong.


127 posted on 01/21/2019 2:14:53 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Cocked, locked and ready to ROCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr

Widjet Jr -

You CLEARLY haven’t read the text of the Ark decision.

Although Justice Gray’s dicta [rationale for his opinion] indicates that he believes that Ark was natural born, the dicta DOES NOT COUNT as the decision.

As in ALL SCOTUS decisions,the words in the declaratory statement at the end of the text ARE the decision. NOTHING ELSE.

I NEVER TOLD YOU ARK WAS NATURALIZED, I TOLD YOU THAT HE WAS DECLARED A CITIZEN UNDER THE TEXT OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT, AS PER THE WRITTEN DECISION. ARK WAS NOT DECLARED TO BE NATURAL BORN !!!


211 posted on 01/21/2019 6:52:15 PM PST by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson