To: LuvFreeRepublic; bagster
Thanks, if anyone follows up on my #37 please refer to the corrected text below, since I dropped an important "NOT" in my speed typing of #37. It should read,
==========================================================
His use of the words Marine and Ranger and Recon together seems highly suspect, since the Rangers are Army. The USMC has Recon but not Ranger designations, so far as Ive ever heard (correction welcome if this is wrong).
Also, since he would have been 17-18 yrs. old at the very end of the Vietnam period, the time frame should be researched to see whether he has lied about combat service (I have not tried to review all of his public statements and interviews, just raising the questions). He may well have been in stateside training when US combat forces were withdrawn from Vietnam, because he would have just turned 17 as the US military involvement was about to end. Research needed.
He may have served but not been in the combat theater (ala Dick Blumenthal).... or is it possible he never was in the military at all??? He would NOT be too likely to mangle his service details if he had actually served, would he? Ofc it is possible that ignorant churnalists are the ones who have bungled references to his military service.
The case definitely calls for research to know if the guy is what he claims to be.
44 posted on
01/21/2019 12:11:04 PM PST by
Trump_the_Evil_Left
(FReeper formerly known as Enchante (registered Sept. 5, 2001), back from the wild....)
To: Trump_the_Evil_Left
Thanks for the NOT. I didnt even catch it.
If you come across anymore info about this, please ping me.
#StolenValor
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson