Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Crenshaw: Moving the State of the Union 'silly,' 'a terrible precedent'......
washingtonexaminer ^ | 1/16/2019 | Al Weaver

Posted on 01/16/2019 8:38:03 PM PST by caww

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: caww

Nancy Pelosi,Donald Trump was elected President of the United States,get over it!


41 posted on 01/17/2019 3:56:25 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“Nancy will be sitting immediately behind PDJT during the address.
I have concern that her facial tics will be distracting”

Somebody do a Nancy cam!


42 posted on 01/17/2019 4:19:15 AM PST by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed it wright.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: crz

Whoa....

Wonder if Jennifer Rubin has seen that...??


43 posted on 01/17/2019 4:24:17 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: caww

She Is all in.

At any point should she stand, clap, smile at something POTUS says, she will be picked apart by her own.

Every facial movement, every breath will be under a microscope.

She can’t handle it.


44 posted on 01/17/2019 4:29:34 AM PST by LouisianaJoanof Arc (The future is best decided by ballots, not bullets. Ronald Reagan 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

If Trump moves the SOTU he ought to go whole hog and include: huge venue, GIANT 20 ft high video screen loaded with back to back bullet points of all of the Dems supporting his ideas then trashing them.


45 posted on 01/17/2019 5:46:56 AM PST by TalBlack (It's hard to shoot people when they are shooting back at you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I did research the opinions in the constitutional convention debates and YES, Morris, Sherman and Wilson talked about this very thing. They called it a “pure and unmixed” tyranny by cabal.

Of course, they also talked about tyranny by a monarch-since they were discussing the monarchy in Britain for comparison.

SO..although they did not like it, they needed to put in checks and balances for executive veto against this type of tyranny as well as impeachment against the executive to prevent a dictator...it seems.

Some, actually did not want an executive. So we know some of the opinions of the founders. More research is needed and I am about spent for a while.

The book I have is the Anti-Federalist Papers and Constitutional Convention Debates. By Ralph Ketcham.


46 posted on 01/17/2019 8:01:01 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950

It’s actually quite clear. It can be in any chamber or no chamber at all.


47 posted on 01/17/2019 8:15:10 AM PST by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: crz

Thanks for the mention of this book. I’ll bookmark it for later reference too.


48 posted on 01/17/2019 5:32:49 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: caww

49 posted on 01/18/2019 12:42:20 AM PST by vikingrinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson