Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

the Navigation act of 1817 was passed in retaliation for the British closing their Caribbean ports to American ships.
Not as a measure to stick it to the South. Nothing in the Navigation act requires the use of New York or Northeastern shipping companies.


519 posted on 01/17/2019 1:14:00 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe
the Navigation act of 1817 was passed in retaliation for the British closing their Caribbean ports to American ships. Not as a measure to stick it to the South.

Which is why it initially passed with support from the Southern states. It wasn't till later that they discovered how it was to be used to rack up profits and control for the same North Eastern headquartered businesses.

Nothing in the Navigation act requires the use of New York or Northeastern shipping companies.

You should read how William Willberforce cleverly tricked the Slave side into accepting proposed legislation that had no obvious threat in it when it was passed.

They didn't see the threat in it, and in so many years, that legislation utterly destroyed the slave trade.

522 posted on 01/17/2019 2:07:19 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson