Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
You prove my point. They talk about it as a "resupply effort." They minimize the military nature, and they emphasize the "supply" nature, when in fact it is heavily weighted towards fighting.

And the reason behind that being?

357 posted on 01/14/2019 5:35:31 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
And the reason behind that being?

The reason behind it is partisan. They want to support the notion that the Union bears no blame for triggering the war, and it was all those hot head Confederates who attacked Sumter for no reason whatsoever.

Calling it "supply ships" supports this fiction. Calling it what it was, a belligerent War fleet with orders to attack them, calls into question the narrative that the South started it.

They don't want to confuse people with facts that cloud the narrative.

390 posted on 01/15/2019 7:12:46 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson