“Other than DNA at the crime scene , No motive given, no sexual assault, whats the connection between these 2?”
yeah, DNA all by itself with zero other evidence is unlikely to convict ...
Hopefully, they can break the guy down, if he has absolutely no good reason why his blood was found, wherever the cop found it. That strikes me a bit odd that he won’t say where or how he found the blood, though.
DNA evidence isnt enough to convict.There must be 3 things for a murder conviction, motive, opportunity, and means. what if he was 1000 miles away when she was murdered. Where did they get a dna sample from him?. is he or has he been charged with other violent crimes? Im not saying hes innocent or guilty. but for some reason the news story is very short on details. was he a neighbor? a family friend?
why not?.....seems lots of people get out of prison precisely because of dna.