Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Simon Green

I agree that there is no ban on full autos at the federal level

Then you just agreed with the only statement I have made on this subject on this post. The other comments you made are not relevant to that statement. What is a “de facto” ban? If I can purchase something, is it banned or not? That is a straw man argument. Obviously people are willing to pay 20 or 30 thousand dollars for an M16. If they are willing and able to purchase them, how is that a ban? And I’m pretty sure I have not mentioned in one post about bump stocks. I am only defending the statement I made, that automatic weapons are not banned. You agree with me, yet feel a need to bring up unrelated subjects. That confuses me very much.


176 posted on 12/18/2018 1:59:31 PM PST by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: suthener
And I’m pretty sure I have not mentioned in one post about bump stocks. I am only defending the statement I made, that automatic weapons are not banned. You agree with me, yet feel a need to bring up unrelated subjects. That confuses me very much.

Bump stocks are the subject of the OP. It's hardly off-topic for this thread.

178 posted on 12/18/2018 2:08:02 PM PST by Simon Green ("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson