I’m not a lawyer, but shouldn’t a reasonable judge ask: “why did the FBI go to his office in the first place????”
No crime had been committed. No one was under investigation. It seems the ONLY reason to have gone to meet Flynn was for the purpose of entrapment.
The DOJ is the Department of Entrapment...
Ninety percent never go to trail...
my question is if there was no investigation at the time they spoke and they told him no attorney was needed does that mean that at any time I am talking with an fbi agent I can be arrested for not being truthful.
Example... I meet my friend the FBI agent for lunch we start talking he asks me what I was up to last night I lie and say I stayed home last night and watched a movie not wanting to admit I was t a massage parlor. later on that day an investigation opens up because that night a masseuse is murder at the massage parlor. he fbi agent is assigned the case finds out that I was at the parlor that night in the course of the investigation. me not knowing anything about the murder and thinking that all I was doing was having lunch with the agent not giving testimony is charged with lying to a fedral agent. set to jail for it despite the fact that someone else is arrested for the murder
The concepts on display in my example is what I think happened to general Flynn with the exception of the fact that the agents were investigating but Flynn had not a clue about the crime they were investigating in fact there was no legal case at the time.
I think soetoro's pal,Sally Yates, sent them to manufacture a perjury charge.
She's the one that brought up the Logan Act but Flynn did nothing illegal in talking to Kisylak as he was the National Security Advisor to the President Elect.
They already knew what was said as they tapped the call and then illegally unmasked Flynn.
The FIBBERS don't record interviews or interrogations because it would make it too difficult for them to lie.