The smoking gun that proves it was not a campaign finance law violation is that the prosecutors had a “non-prosecutorial” agreement with AMI, the corporation that paid the $150,000 to the second woman. Now, why would the prosecutor choose not to charge AMI with the same “crime” that Cohen copped to? Because it was NOT a violation. They lumped all the phony charges in with the tax evasion, which was the REAL crime that Cohen is being punished for with jail time and fines. It’s all a scam with a political motive to embarass the President by implying Cohen is guilty because of the payout to women.
“The smoking gun that proves it was not a campaign finance law violation is that the prosecutors had a “non-prosecutorial” agreement with AMI”
Sounds interesting but I don’t fully understand. Could you give a little more detail?