To: LS
I thought you have to have 66 to impeach...in Senate
127 posted on
12/12/2018 7:33:28 AM PST by
nikos1121
(With Trump, we have our own Age of Pericles)
To: nikos1121
You are right. 67 votes. Votes that are not there now and never will be there. Did you see Nutty Nan and slimey Chuck get owned by Trump on TV yesterday? Do you think these inept tools are going to engineer impeachment and removal? Uh no! They aren't. Here is what will happen. Starting in January the Democrats will go on a 24 month run of using their House majority to run their mouths and make sure no legislation gets passed. It will be congressional gridlock with the Dems on TV blaming the GOP in the Senate and Trump for obfuscating their agenda. That's about it. We control the presidency and the Senate. Trump will still be able to accomplish a lot administratively during this period. And that it what he will do. By 2020 the Dems will have irritated everyone so much we should easily retake the House. Meanwhile I believe we just got rid of about 40 unwanted RINOs from office. All this talk about impeachment is ridiculous so just take a look at who is talking it up. The same person who ad nauseum insisted Mueller was really secretly working with Trump to get Hillary and the Podestas. Gee somebody forgot to tell Mueller. 😆
128 posted on
12/12/2018 8:13:23 AM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: nikos1121
67
that’s why I say for now Trump is safe with 39-40 solid; another 6-7 “squishes” like Rubes, who will vote to acquit on something stupid like campaign finance violation, but if Trump declassifies FISAs, this is the kind of thing that will send Rubes and Sassehole and Burrito and Mel Tillis over the edge & Trump would lose them.
129 posted on
12/12/2018 8:38:52 AM PST by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson