I have found a way to argue with the libtards on ‘climate change’.
I just ask them if we ALL agree that pollution is bad and we should stop it.
That seems to make sense to them.
Then I ask if they really believe that conservatives WANT POLLUTION. The ones that are not truly brain dead will say... yeah, OK...
Then I hit them with “OK then show me where the Paris Agreement did anything to stop pollution?
When they can’t I tell them that it just transferred huge amounts of money to outer shitholes that were actually ALLOWED to pollute more. And LOOK IT UP FR THEMSELVES. That is why Trump cancelled it.
This has worked except for the REALLY REALLY stupid ones, who say “Yeah you don’t care you just want to pollute all the rivers and kill your grandma”
This
Climate ‘change’ deniers. The climate will always change from ice age to warming periods. Always has and always will.
Off with his head.
Pollution so bad, you can cut it with a knife...
http://sciencenetlinks.com/science-news/science-updates/asian-brown-cloud/
The yellow vests protests are very significant. The climate hysterics can fly around the world yacking all they want, but the only way they can actually do anything is via energy taxes. Without that, there’s nothing and now even in France, ostensibly one of the most friendly places for them, they’ve been rejected.
Foolish policies based on the premise that imminent climate catastrophe is certain, are being advanced by the ignorant media, academic folly, and non-scientific intelligentsia.
There is a difference between climate change that takes place over a 100 to 1,000 years and weather variations that occur within predictable ranges.
Of course it is cheaper to just declare that you are causing global warming. Why try to use sound science to determine the role of mankind in weather change, when you can just declare that the "sky is falling?"
Do the politicians control the weather? Mankind's contribution to climate change is far from settled science.