[gswilder]

I wonder do the dems actually believe 80% of the stuff they say about Trump, or just say it for effect. Seriously, paying Stormy Daniels off, is not illegal, and not a campaign violation. Let the dems go for impeachment... they will pay big time in 2020.

[MAGAthon]

when Comey is questioned a second time on 17 Dec., EVERY SINGLE QUESTION should be about Mueller’s investigation is supposed to be about Russian collusion/interference in the 2016 presidential election, so why isn’t it about HRC/DNC/Obama Admin officials/unmasking/CIA/DNI/FBI/MSM/Fusion GPS/Steele/Russians/FISA court judges etc etc etc.

[Olog-hai]

Well, you see they say it is suddenly a “campaign finance violation” because they say it “influenced” the 2016 election somehow, and because they say it is such a thing and it didn’t get listed as a campaign expense on campaign finance filings, presto change-o—“felony”, according to them. Even more tortuous than the “penumbras and emanations” in the Roe v. Wade decision.

[qaz123]

I don’t think it matters to them. They have the upper hand because the media and the tech companies are 100% behind them. They can say what they want and no one questions them.

All of them have said at one time that there’s no evidence of collusion, but they still push collusion. When asked to define collusion, they just say DJT colluded with the Russians to influence the election. When asked how? He colluded. Nothing more.

And not one of them can actually define ‘collusion’, in any way. And if I’m not mistaken, collusion in any form cannot even be applied in this, as nothing they’ve said or made accusations about fall under the definition.

But they don’t care. It riles up their base. Allows them to do what they want, ie Voter Fraud on such a massive scale it should scare the sh*t out of everybody, and if anyone challenges them, it’s one “ism” after another and voter suppression.