“We also put in a hell of a lot more time than those who did not serve to retirement.”
Based on your reply those kids who got deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan and had their arms or legs blown off before completing their first enlistment didn’t earn anything either you elitist prick.
“So get off your fn high horse a-hole”
Practice what you preach Blue Falcon.
My original statement was a statement of fact not a complaint. My retirement is untouched by the change and likely will not be effected, but it may not be for future retirees. But rather than disagree with what was said, you chose to come back as an a-hole, attacking and throwing up non-relevant arguments. Not one of your arguments had a thing to do with what was said. You come back as an a-hole, that is the way you get treated in response. You apparently dont have the mental ability to understand what was being said. If you are going to throw up arguments, at least make them accurate and relevant. Retirees vs those who honorable served amount to 17-20 percent, not the 2 percent you stated. And, the fact that retirees still have plenty of benefits is an asinine statement and would be like you contracting for a 2000 sq ft house to be build and when the house is done the contractor tells you that you are only getting a 1000 sq ft house, but that it is still plenty of house. Your statement that my reply says that those who lost legs arms etc didnt earn anything is also false and again shows your lack of mental ability to understand what was said. I dealt with a lot of pricks like you in the military who have chips on their shoulder, feel entitled, have a myopic view of what is going on and lack the mental ability to see beyond their immediate little world. Dont bother responding. Youve proven you are a complete a-hole who is incapable of looking beyond his little entitled world. Ive wasted enough time on you.