FR has become such a pit of ignorant nattering nabobs of negativity towards practically anything Trump does (or doesn’t do), it’s a waste of time to read the comments anymore ... I guess all of these ignorant fools would have been much happier if Hillary had won in 2016 ... maybe they can support her in 2020 ...
“FR has become such a pit of ignorant nattering nabobs...”
Agreed. What is increasingly rare on this site is any application of reason. I have a hard time believing some of these folks aren’t liberal plants.
I don’t recall years ago on FR people acting like they can somehow sound smart by simply name-calling without any data or arguments. And purifying the party down to just Trump and whichever commenter can blacklist everybody else first.
There is only one swamp-like bit of information I see in this story so far. It is that Trump chose Sessions instead of who he thought was best (Barr) simply out of loyalty.
I still like Trump, but that is a swamp move. The foundation of the swamp is built on loyalty trumping reason.
Personally, I still would have initially thought Sessions would be better than Barr mostly because he had AG experience that was not DC-based and a good right wing record generally. It did not work out well, but there were better reasons to pick him than loyalty.