Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qiviut
"Yup. VERY disappointed to see that [Larry Klayman] was who was representing Corsi." Sad but true. During the Clinton regime he filed multiple complaints in various courts, none of which, to the best of my knowledge, got even to a significant discovery stage. Judicial Watch seemed to become effective only after he left.
47 posted on 12/03/2018 10:45:45 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: libstripper

Judicial Watch seemed to become effective only after he left.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Very true, in fact “Judicial Watch” under Klayman got no respect .... if you saw JW back in those days, it was more of a “yeah, yeah” response because you knew it would amount to nothing, sort of like when you see Klayman’s name on a lawsuit now. It was a rancorous parting of ways between Klayman & Fitton, but JW is now respected and Fitton garners respect as well. Due to JW’s lawsuits, they’ve certainly made a huge difference in the amount of knowledge the public has about ‘things’

The “dirty laundry”:
Larry Klayman sues Judicial Watch (2006 date on article)
https://www.wnd.com/2006/04/35686/


59 posted on 12/03/2018 1:41:56 PM PST by Qiviut (McCain & Obama's Legacy in two words: DONALD TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson