Sasse was trouble past 2 years with judges?
No, and he won’t be a problem here either, there are some people who just like to throw his name into the mix to sound all gloom-and-doomy.
I doubt Romney would have any trouble with the Farr pick either. The evidence pretty clearly is flawed.
Scott decided to believe some Democrat senators who told him about this “new evidence’, he looked at it and found it was wrong, and has found that democrats who are NOT trying to trash all nominees have actually said Farr is a good person, so I expect him to vote yes later.
But there is zero benefit in holding a vote that might end up “no”, as you can’t come back from that.
They don’t want to wait until next year, because he’ll have to be nominated again. Although if the Senate adjourns, Trump could appoint him in the interim.