1 posted on
11/27/2018 3:11:14 PM PST by
lowbridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
To: lowbridge
112 posted on
11/27/2018 5:10:47 PM PST by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: lowbridge
How would this work: whenever a congregation calls a pastor, or a bishop makes an appointment, will an Austin Human Rights Commissar sit in on the proceedings and approve the choice?
To: lowbridge
They can just refuse to hire them due to “lack of experience”, or “poor fit for the role” - like big companies do. No need to state the real reason.
115 posted on
11/27/2018 5:28:32 PM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
To: lowbridge
a law made by Godless RATS...
116 posted on
11/27/2018 5:29:27 PM PST by
Chode
( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
To: lowbridge
You can bet that this won’t apply to the Black churches.
117 posted on
11/27/2018 5:35:12 PM PST by
Zionist Conspirator
("Conservatism" without G-d is just another form of Communism.)
To: lowbridge
...uh, where’s the church and state separation on this issue?
120 posted on
11/27/2018 5:55:33 PM PST by
ThePatriotsFlag
(We are getting even more than we voted for.)
To: lowbridge
Irrelevant ... there are no “Christian” churches in this Texas’ Progressive sh!thole .
121 posted on
11/27/2018 5:56:20 PM PST by
RetiredTexasVet
(Start using cash and checks or the elite class and bankers will make "cashless" the norm.)
To: lowbridge
Hello........., Supreme Court?????? First Amendment under attack!
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;...”
free exercise thereof, FREE, not prohibiting you from practising your core religious beliefs.
No puny city ordinance can take away your first amendment rights.
126 posted on
11/27/2018 8:42:44 PM PST by
faucetman
(Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
To: lowbridge
Won’t survive legal challenge... left wingers are just flat out evil people.
To: lowbridge
What happens if the first known gay pastor decides he
wants to place a Nativity display at city hall?
134 posted on
11/27/2018 10:41:02 PM PST by
Sivad
(Demo M/O = infiltrate, overtake, politicize, weaponize)
To: lowbridge
I don't doubt that this is the Austin leftist government's ultimate goal, but in all fairness I'll say that the absence of exemption language doesn't necessarily open the door to the government's right to impose its will upon churches and Christian groups. In a sane, rational society exemptions shouldn't even be necessary; the Constitution, common sense and a priori assumptions of absolute property rights would overrule all without any chance that the perverts would prevail.
I've never been a fan of exemption clauses anyway. They imply that but for the presence of the exemption clause, churches and religious groups would be fair game. That is a very tenuous, defensive position to find ourselves.
137 posted on
11/28/2018 6:29:53 AM PST by
fwdude
(Forget the Catechism, the RCC's real doctrine is what they allow with impunity.)
To: lowbridge
If a churche is a 501c3 organizations, is Christ really the head of their church? Or is the Federal Government?
The Feds (I know this is a local Austin ordinance, but eventually it will be the Feds) will command the churches to do anything they wish, under threat of losing their tax-status.
142 posted on
11/28/2018 12:28:42 PM PST by
Kalamata
(How to interpret The Revelation: http://bibleresearchtools.com/bible-study-video-series/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson